MESYUARAT PERTAMA PENGGAL PERTAMA PARLIMEN KE 12 PADA 28 APRIL HINGGA 27 MEI 2008
SOALAN JAWAB LISAN
1. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI PELAJARAN menjelaskan prestasi pencapaian pelajar UPSR dan PMR dalam Matematik dan Sains sejak ia dikendalikan dalam Bahasa Inggeris? Tidakkah ada hasrat Kementerian menukar kembali pengajaran kedua-dua subjek ini ke dalam bahasa ibunda?
2. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI PELAJARAN menjelaskan mengenai jumlah sekolah-sekolah baru yang akan dibina pada tahun 2008 di seluruh Malaysia termasuk Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina dan Tamil mengikut Negeri-Negeri amnya dan di Hulu Langat khasnya?
3. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI SAINS, TEKNOLOGI DAN INOVASI menjelaskan status Tenaga Nuklear sebagai sumber Tenaga Alternatif memandangkan kenaikan harga minyak yang terus melambung naik?. Apakah polisi kerajaan mengenai sumber tenaga nuklear?
4. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta PERDANA MENTERI menjelaskan peruntukan yang diberi kepada Ahli Parlimen Kerajaan dalam usaha memberi perkhidmatan kepada rakyat yang memilih mereka secara demokrasi. Adakah Kerajaan juga berhasrat untuk memberi peruntukan juga kepada Ahli Parlimen lain kerana mereka juga dikehendaki memberi perkhidmatan kepada semua rakyat dikawasan masing-masing.
5. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta PERDANA MENTERI menjelaskan status penggunaan LPG sebagai Punca Tenaga. Sejauhmana keberkesanan pelaksanaannya di seluruh Malaysia? Adakah infrastrukturnya cukup bagi menggalakkan pengguna mengalih penggunaan dari petrol kepada LPG?
6. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI SAINS, TEKNOLOGI DAN INOVASI menjelaskan mengenai Penguatkuasaan Lesen Radas Penyinaran yang di keluarkan oleh Lembaga Perlesenan Tenaga Atom kepada Syarikat Swasta. Berapa banyak Radas Penyinaran yang dilesenkan sepanjang 2007? Sejauhmana pemantauan dibuat bagi mempastikan keselamatan pekerja sinaran di Syarikat-Syarikat berkenaan?
7. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA menjelaskan status kawalan keselamatan pekerja di tapak binaan dan pampasan yang diperolehi mereka sekiranya berlaku kemalangan. Minta perincian kes kemalangan industri pembinaan sepanjang 2007. Apakah langkah yang diambil terhadap pemaju yang mengabaikan keselamatan pekerja?
8. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI SUMBER ASLI DAN ALAM SEKITAR menjelaskan langkah yang diambil dalam memulih kembali sungai yang tercemar. Sejauhmana perkembangan projek ‘satu negeri satu sungai’ yang dijalankan? Berapakah kos perbelanjaan pemulihan itu?
9. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI SUMBER ASLI DAN ALAM SEKITAR menjelaskan kos pembinaan SMART tunnel yang memberi faedah besar kepada rakyat? Sejauhmanakah pihak Kerajaan bersedia dengan tenaga kerja mahir dan kemudahan Teknologi Maklumat dalam mengawal selia SMART tunnel ketika keadaan cuaca yang tidak menentu ini?
10. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI DI JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI menjelaskan aktiviti pelaburan Tabung Haji di luar negara.Berapa banyakkah Tabung Haji memperuntukkan dananya dalam pelaburan sektor pertanian terutama kelapa sawit, dan bagaimanakah pulangan dari pelaburan tersebut? Bagaimana pula dengan tenaga kerja yang terlibat dalam menguruskan pelaburan diluar negara?
SOALAN JAWAB BERTULIS
11. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta PERDANA MENTERI menjelaskan mengenai kos yang akan dicadangkan bagi seorang Jemaah Haji menunaikan Haji musim akan datang. Dengan pendapatan dari pelaburan wang pencarum tidakkah Tabung Haji bercadang mengurangkan kos pakej Haji?
12. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI PERTANIAN DAN INDUSTRI ASAS TANI memperincikan purata pendapatan petani bagi setiap ekar sawah atau ladang yang mereka usahakan dan adakah ia setimpal dengan kos perbelanjaan yang mereka laburkan? Siapakah yang menentukan harga belian komoditi berkenaan? Adakah ada cadangan untuk menaikkan harga padi sekiranya harga beras dinaikkan?
13. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI DALAM NEGERI menjelaskan mengenai:
(a) Status kemasukan pekerja asing yang terlalu ramai sehingga menampakkan penggangguran berlaku diantara mereka disebabkan banyak industri-industri yang ditutup. Berapakah jumlah sebenar pendatang asing yang berada di Malaysia mengikut negara? Apakah tindakan yang diambil terhadap agen-agen yang membawa masuk pekerja asing secara sewenang-wenangnya tanpa melihat keperluan dalam sektor Industri?.
(b) Bagaimana pula kawalan terhadap pelajar luar negara yang mengguna Visa Pelajar tetapi mengambil kesempatan bekerja di negara kita?
14. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI PENERANGAN menjelaskan apakah kuota peratus kategori siaran hiburan, berita, keilmuan, dan penerangan/dokumetari, di dalam siaran TV milik kerajaan? Bagaimana dengan kuota yang dilaksanakan oleh TV swasta? Apakah terdapat kajian yang dijalankan untuk melihat kesan daripada siaran hiburan TV ke atas gejala sosial di negara ini?
15. Dr Che Rosli Bin Che Mat [Hulu Langat] minta MENTERI PELAJARAN menjelaskan
(a) berapakah peruntukan perbelanjaan tahun 2007 yang diberikan kepada Sekolah Agama Rakyat mengikut negeri oleh kerajaan Pusat?
(b) Berapakah jumlah bantuan peruntukan perbelanjaan yang diberi sepanjang 2007 kepada Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina dan Tamil di seluruh negara?
Difailkan dalam: ADR Hulu Langat, Soalan dewan
Dear YB,
Please check out this issue. Your kind consideration is appreciated. Summary: A Chinese Temple is being erected on a plot of land previously gazetted and used as a recreation area along the main road along Jalan Permaisuri 1/6 of Section 6 in Bandar Mahkota Cheras. The MKAJ supports the construction by issuing an approval for the same. They have also disregarded the sentiments of those staying here during a call for resident feedback where they blatantly stated that the project is already approved and no objection will be entertained. This is a main road and previously a playground.
It also simply cannot be understood at all why the new but fast becoming old state government in Selangor has failed to take any action to determine whether any wrongdoing in this matter. Moreover when the good people who own houses in that particular section brought their plight to the dailies.
I do believe that there is a planning guideline where such matters are concerned.
The plot of land which is situated along the main road leading to Jalan Permaisuri 1/6 of Section 6 in Bandar Mahkota Cheras, used to be fully occupied by a jogging track, badminton court, and childrens’ playground.
Not wishing to comment on the apparent neglect of upkeep of the facilities mentioned before it was ceremoniously taken over by a group of people claiming to be the committee for a Chinese Temple, and I do say ceremoniously because the kick-off party was very colourful and loud with trafffic guards, Karaoke, and the like, the fact that remains that this temple is in the midst of construction already and located on a land reserved for recreation.
Over 8 metre-high walls and the temple structure are being erected on the spot where the playground once stood in entirety.
Liau, a retiree, laments that the MKAJ is not doing their work in safeguarding the interests of the residents in the area by allowing the work to go on as long as it has. He and many others banked on the capability of the new government to step in correctively and audit the whole process for any wrongdoing.
His gaze lingers on the outline of the newly erected temple brick walls and the site where his grandchildren would play during the weekends they would visit him and his wife. “A temple they can build again. Do I have to move? I’m retired and my life savings went into buying this house. The people building this temple are an inconsiderate lot. Although I share the same religious faith, this is more than just money, this is about proper governance and location. Look at it. When it is fully done, it will block the view which I have enjoyed for years,” he says.
The construction of the temple is a blow to the local residents. My only hope is that it does not turn into a political fiasco. Hmm..maybe that’s why there is a declined effort to act…
Earlier…
It has come to my attention that construction of a Chinese Temple has commenced at the Children’s Playground near Jalan Permaisuri 1/6 of Section 6 in Bandar Mahkota Cheras amidst serious objections from the houseowners along the stretch facing the playground and from other residents living in that area.
Apparently, the Kajang Municipal Council (Majlis Perbandaran Kajang – MPKJ) had earlier sent notice of this project to the houseowners seeking their feedback and possible objections to the same. After some written protest, as these residents did not want to lose the playground and the land it was on, the MPKJ “invited” them to a meeting at the MPKJ headoffice located at Jalan Cempaka Putih, Off Jalan Semenyih, 43000 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan. At this meeting, they were informed that the project had already been approved by the MPKJ and that the letter sent requesting for feedback was only a formality. Reportedly, the temple’s representative also had the nerve to tell one resident that they were initially “offered” 2 choices and they had chosen the playground for obvious reasons and also that nothing would deter the project as they had gotten it approved by the MPKJ.
While we are living in a multiracial society, it is extremely rare to find Chinese Temples along major main roads in the community. Although nice the fact harbors that some abuse of power may have taken place since there is a MPKJ notice board erected on this piece of land quoting the 1976 Land Act, forbidding the use of the land for any other purpose than it’s original purpose of a children’s playground and badminton court. This brings to mind a similar case at Bukit Gasing where original plans for the land development deviated.
It will be a sad day for these residents when the project is completed as they would not only have lost an area for recreation and leisure activities, but they would have also been short changed in their purchase of their residential properties since they did not expect they would have a house fronting a place of worship. Least of all, the various pollution from increased traffic during festivities, incense smoke, and noise.
Best Regards,
MHH